![]() |
Knowledge Management,
Attention, Human Capacity and Capital Building ..but even more so its a story about surfing dogs, cleaning teeths, politics from washington, about fireballs from nong khai and strong waitresses from bavaria during the 'octoberfest'! |
![]() |
PART
1 = GENERAL IDEA ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Towards the Cybernetic
Era: 9 change factors |
![]() |
Knowledge Organizations must build and develop a human capital - Knowledge-oriented
Strategic Management: The top management translates its long-term objectives
into competency needs, strives to develop a knowledgeable organization,
and ensures that the organization's structure encourages and stimulates
knowledge at all levels. |
![]() |
Key economic resource is always what is potentially available to all, but ends up being collected more by few who therefore have an economic advantage over the many who have little but know enough about it to want it. Before the Industrial Era, it was mainly raw materials and food. Then, in the Industrial Era, it became products, assets, because factories started to produce enough for everybody or nearly. Now, it becomes information and knowledge because the Internet enables everybody to access information and therefore theoretically knowledge. Note: something that most people believe is out of reach is not a good economic advantage because the possibilities of trading it are very restricted. |
![]() |
A Knowledge Mess! Example for information
overflow and a dreadful solution: *Automated Response* Dear Friend: |
![]() |
Many KM Theories over last 10 years |
![]() |
One common denominator
linking organisational behaviour, strategic management, corporate leaders
and management gurus: KM will assist organisations in Human Capacity
Building (HCB) and therefore improving their chances of surviving
in the eBusiness context The waitress from
the bavarian 'octoberfest' stays as a symbol for a high capacity person,
having to juggle up to 16 beer hugs, weighing each of them about 1 liter. |
![]() |
PART
2 = THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 3 CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
Effective Participation
in KM: Does our organization provide
|
![]() |
Means Create access to technologies. A knowledge worker is no more an undistinguishable number within a workforce, but an economic unit in itself, with a unique set of knowledge and competencies. This set of knowledge and competencies has value for the company insofar as the knowledge worker can receive and dispatch information, not only to/ from his close colleagues or even within the organization, but to/from the entire world (Internet, emails, chats, etc.) on one hand, as well as to/from his own historic self (databases, libraries, archives, etc.) on the other hand. The knowledge worker can therefore build upon the knowledge and competencies of the whole world to enhance and improve his own and in turn contribute his own to the world |
![]() |
KM Technical
Solution An efficient KM solution is nothing less than an enterprise portal, enabling the capture, storage and search of information and knowledge of all natures and levels, coming from employees, external partners within the organization's value network, and even the greater community. The type of information it should contain can be classified into roughly 4 types, from most to least structured: data, information, explicit knowledge, tacit knowledge. To each of these types must correspond appropriate technical tools to capture and store them (databases for data, indexed libraries for information, expert systems for explicited knowledge, and communication platforms and links for indirect access to tacit knowledge through its owners). Most of the valuable knowledge in a company is currently tacit. It is imperative to offer access to tacit knowledge's owners, but also to strive to explicit this knowledge in a way or another, because only explicited knowledge can be accessed and used in the absence of its original owner. |
![]() |
Skills
enable ability
Capacity to
perform ones work within new environment See Davenports Deficit
Principle In his recent book,
The Attention Economy Thomas Davenport navigates a
clear path for us to follow in describing and analysing the nature of
attention and its impact upon business, strategies and individuals. Perhaps
the most pervasive point raised is that there exists an attention
deficit, in that attention is a scarce resource in the face of the
information glut that we experience in our daily work (and personal) lives
there are more things that attract and attempt to consume our attention
than we have attention to spare. Davenport (2001) terms this as the Deficit
Principle Before you can manage attention, you need
to understand just how depleted this resource is for organisations and
individuals which has psychological consequences (in the form
of info stress) and wider implications for the way we work
and for our organisations, namely: The dog on the surfboard is a symbol for high capacit performance within a new environment. Not only does the dog manage the shaking surface of a surfboard, he even seems not to be disturbed by the water surrounding him |
![]() |
Will
Ensure active participation
Much easier to develop
strategies and allocate resources to provide means and skills, than to
create, change, develop and maintain the mindset and motivation of employees
and the organization as a whole These dogs do sure active participate, wonder how the woman achieves to motivate all dogs in such a way to follow every movement [guess there are some dog cookies behind the back] |
![]() |
PART 3 = KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ASA SOURCE OF SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE CONDITIONS AND CHALLENGES Potential for Sustainable
Competitive Advantage Uniqueness: The Fireballs [bang fai] from Nong Khai are a good 'tourist attarction' since they are unique and only visible at this special time of the year. If it how ever is a nature event or perhaps more a human-made spectacle will be shown in the future. |
![]() |
Potential for Sustainable
Competitive AdvantageDurability: Two symbols of durability, the millenium watch and Coca Cola, successful since many years all over the world, a perfect product it seems |
![]() |
Potential for Sustainable
Competitive Advantage Value: |
![]() |
BUT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
FULFILLS ALL THESE CONDITIONS ONLY IF
|
![]() |
Next
criterion for success Ability to transform such Special Projects or Strategic Development Initiatives related to KM into routine and internalised ways or working that are embedded within the corporate culture and the day to day working habits of employees To develop newer, better, more efficient and effective KM strategies would not provide an advantage for long Rather than viewing and completing KM activities and initiatives as an extra or additional work burden, the successful organisations of tomorrow will find ways of transforming KM activities and practices into normative ways of functioning and completing work. The idea is simple, although the application is difficult: it is that rather than keep KM as a special project, something that must be done especially because the Management wants it at a certain point of time, it should become a second nature for employees who should practice it routinely in their daily work. This lady symbolizes very nice the message above. Even if she would brush her teeth very carefully for the next two days, it would certainly not help. Only if brushing teeth becomes a daily routine, something that automatically is done within ones day - then it will show results |
![]() |
Huge
Challenge Creating a culture conducive to KM and to new ways of working in eBusiness is going to be a huge challenge. Ruggles (1998) completed a study examining Knowledge Management in Practice, which identified: 1. Changing peoples behaviour as the biggest difficulty in KM (56% response); 2. Culture as the biggest impediment to knowledge transfer (54% response); While only 19% of respondents reported Good or Excellent Performance in Facilitating knowledge growth through culture and incentives. |
![]() |
Paradox
1: Explicit vs. Tacit Knowledge We will need to find ways of building our capacity to work in an environment that demands quick, effective responses and decisions while simultaneously considering the future through the creation of shared context, experimentation, thinking and reasoning, and articulating tacit knowledge for application by others and in different contexts and situations To conclude, Its
a day-to-day reality that we often dont have the time or attention
to commit to the processes and activities above and it is also
a strategic reality that to survive in eBusiness it is paramount that
we innovate, re-conceptualise and visualize the business concepts and
models of tomorrow by using the processes and activities above. Developing
HCB Strategies that address this simple but critical paradox will be a
huge challenge." |
![]() |
Paradox
2: Managements Suicide? Traditional approaches to business operations put owners of economic capital (or their representatives) in charge of a hierarchical system that seeks to maximise the return on that economic capital while minimizing risk. But knowledge is a horizontal phenomena, power is transferred from standardized management positions to potentially every worker (Miles, 1998) |
![]() |
Politics are still very strong 'breaks' for KM. Today's organizations and specifically their managers are still too scared to loose their position, once the 'rocket' KM is launched. USA president Bush is certainly not the only possible symbol of such 'politics'. |
![]() |
The name "QWERTY"
for our typewriter keyboard comes from the first six letters in the top
alphabet row (the one just below the numbers). It is also called the "Universal"
keyboard for rather obvious reasons. It was the work of inventor C. L.
Sholes, who put together the prototypes of the first commercial typewriter
in a Milwaukee machine shop back in the 1860's.For years, popular writers
have accused Sholes of deliberately arranging his keyboard to slow down
fast typists who would otherwise jam up his sluggish machine. In fact,
his motives were just the opposite.When Sholes built his first model
in 1868, the keys were arranged alphabetically in two rows. At the time,
Milwaukee was a backwoods town. The crude machine shop tools available
there could hardly produce a finely-honed instrument that worked with
precision. Yes, the first typewriter was sluggish. Yes, it did clash and
jam when someone tried to type with it. But Sholes was able to figure
out a way around the problem simply by rearranging the letters. Looking
inside his early machine, we can see how he did it.The first typewriter
had its letters on the end of rods called "typebars." The typebars
hung in a circle. The roller which held the paper sat over this circle,
and when a key was pressed, a typebar would swing up to hit the paper
from underneath. If two typebars were near each other in the circle, they
would tend to clash into each other when typed in succession. So, Sholes
figured he had to take the most common letter pairs such as "TH"
and make sure their typebars hung at safe distances. He did this using
a study of letter-pair frequency prepared by educator Amos Densmore, brother
of James Densmore, who was Sholes' chief financial backer. The QWERTY
keyboard itself was determined by the existing mechanical linkages of
the typebars inside the machine to the keys on the outside. Sholes' solution
did not eliminate the problem completely, but it was greatly reduced.
The keyboard arrangement was considered important enough to be included
on Sholes' patent granted in 1878, some years after the machine was into
production. QWERTY's effect, by reducing those annoying clashes, was to
speed up typing rather than slow it down.Sholes and Densmore went to
Remington, the arms manufacturer, to have their machines mass-produced.
In 1874, the first Type-Writer appeared on the market. No contemporary
account complains about the illogical keyboard. In fact, few contemporary
accounts even mention the machine at all. At its debut, it was largely
ignored.Sales of the typewriter did not take off until after Remington's
second model was introduced in 1878, offering the only major modification
to the keyboard as we know it today. The first machines typed only capital
letters. The new offered both upper and lower case by adding the familiar
shift key. It is called a shift because it actually caused the carriage
to shift in position for printing either of two letters on each typebar.
Modern electronic machines no longer shift mechanically when the shift
key is pressed, but its name remains the same. In the decades following
the original Remington, many alternative keyboards came and went. Then,
in 1932, with funds from the Carnegie Foundation, Professor August Dvorak,
of Washington State University, set out to develop the ultimate typewriter
keyboard once and for all.Dvorak went beyond Blickensderfer in arranging
his letters according to frequency. Dvorak's home row uses all five vowels
and the five most common consonants: AOEUIDHTNS. With the vowels on one
side and consonants on the other, a rough typing rhythm would be established
as each hand would tend to alternate. Other examples: Japan
dominates the world today with transistorized electronic consumer products
to a degree that impacts the USA's balance of payments with Japan, even
though transistors were invented and patented in the US, because Sony
bought transitor licensing rights from Western Electric at a time when
the American electronics consumer industry was churning out vacuum tube
models and reluctant to compete with its own products. |
![]() |
Paradox
3: How to evaluate intangibles? The most important contribution management needs to make in the 21st century is to increase the productivity of KNOWLEDGE WORK and the KNOWLEDGE WORKER Work on the productivity of the knowledge worker has barely begun. Peter Drucker 1999, Management Challenges for the 21st Century When managers are not able to see direct causes and effects, they are less confident in decisions that might affect them and they may revert to decisions that are more easily justified by the bottom line, no matter how illusory such a justification might be Miles, Grant, et al (1998) Some Conceptual and Research Barriers to the Utilisation of Knowledge |