![]() |
eLearning
A presentation by Prasena to National Family Planning Board of Indonesia by Lukas Ritzel, December 20th, 2002lritzel@prasena.com As the relevance of traditional education systems is questioned, the whole process of learning is being transformed into e-learning, a multi-channel multimedia activity that alone will enable the mass-customized education necessary to help illiterate masses catch up with their environment. Indonesias BKKBN will need to embrace this concept not only to ensure that its employees become and remain knowledge workers, but also to ensure that Indonesians can fully benefit from medicine/technology partnership. Lukas Ritzel, co-founder and Infostructure Director, is Prasenas backbone, in that he is the organizations infostructure architect. In charge of all technical aspects, from web design to database development, networking, virtual work systems and IT support, he has the heavy responsibility to guarantee the efficiency of Prasenas processes and communication networks. Moreover, he identifies, tests and selects the ever-changing technologies that will ensure that both Prasena and its clients benefit optimally from the Cybernetic Revolution. Lukas is Swiss. He
speaks French, English, German, and Thai. |
![]() |
The reason
for me to place M Gandhi at the very beginning of my presentation lies in
my conviction that what ever changes I will suggest to be taken by educational
institutions over the next year, can only be successful if we do it in a
acceptable way for the parties involved. Every change has to be done in
the correct speed and adapted to its cultural environment. Gandhi was a
living example of this philosophy and its this gentle revolution that made
him so strong and so successful.
In January 1948, before
three pistol shots put an end to his life, Gandhi had been on the political
stage for more than fifty years. He head inspired two generations of India
patriots, shaken an empire and sparked off a revolution which was to change
the face of Africa and Asia. To millions of his own people, he was the
Mahatma- the great soul- whose sacred glimpse was a reward in itself.
By the end of 1947 he had lived down much of the suspicion, ridicule and
opposition which he to face, when he first raised the banner of revolt
against racial exclusiveness and imperial domination. His ideas, once
dismissed as quaint and utopian ,had begun to strike answering chords
in some of the finest minds in the world. "Generations to come, it
may be", Einstein had said of Gandhi in July 1944, "will scarcely
believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon earth." |
![]() |
1847 -
http://www.mediahistory.umn.edu/time/1840s.html
1847: Ralph Waldo
Emerson, Poems. |
![]() |
1977 -
http://www.mediahistory.umn.edu/time/1970s.html
1977: Columbus, Ohio,
residents try 2-way cable experiment, QUBE. Steven Biko Dies:
|
![]() |
2002 -
http://www.mediahistory.umn.edu/time/2000s.html
2002: 9 of 10 American
school children have access to computers at home or school. |
![]() |
2002 -
http://www.mediahistory.umn.edu/time/2000s.html
2002: 9 of 10 American
school children have access to computers at home or school. |
![]() |
RIO what
is this ask the audience and give a cd away
For example on back
office / administration of universities: |
![]() |
Dr. Phillip
Harter of Stanford University : If we could shrink the earths population to a village of only 100 people, it would look something like this: 57 Asians 21 Europeans 14 North and South Americans 8 Africans |
![]() |
Dr. Phillip
Harter of Stanford University : If we could shrink the earths population to a village of only 100 people, it would look something like this: 30 white 70 nonwhite 6 people would possess 60% of the worlds wealth, and all 6 would be from the United States |
![]() |
Dr. Phillip
Harter of Stanford University : If we could shrink the earths population to a village of only 100 people, it would look something like this: 70 would be unable to read 50 would suffer malnutrition would have a college education |
![]() |
Indonesia
is specifically ideal for eLearning solutions: 1000s of islands Population 216 million growth rate 1.5% Area 1904000 sq km |
![]() |
Sounds all so very good! Is e the solution we have been waiting for! |
![]() |
Lets
go back in time first so we better understand After IBM s ebusiness ,soon came eLearning |
![]() |
Introduction Computer Based Training (CBT) is self paced learning using a computer package to present the information, rather than a person. There are a variety of delivery methods: over Intranet or Internet, CD, installed on hard drive, etc. There are also a variety of levels of interaction and types of material presented from reading text on the screen and click for the next page to graphics, video, animation, interaction, simulations, tests, quizzes and so on. History In February 1998, an initial evaluation of commercially available CBT for technical subjects was carried out. Two companies, SmartForce (then CBT Systems) and NETg, came to OUCS to give presentations. As a result of the evaluation, it was determined that SmartForce product was preferred. It used graphics, animation, clearly laid out screens with glossary terms, note taking, links to further information, interactive sections, simulations and several ways of testing including discovery questions, a feature the others lacked. It did not include video or sound. This was seen as a positive attribute as it enabled the user to move at their own pace without having to wait for material to be presented. In June 1998, I presented an ITSS Seminar entitled Accreditation and Certification at which using CBT as cheaper way to train people in technical topics was proposed and received strong support. A similar workshop was run at the 1998 ITSS Conference, and again the ideas proved popular. See also the minutes of ITSSG 8 June 1998 and minutes of ITTEG 19 June 1998. In 1999, funding was requested for IT Support Staff training, including a training budget, part of which would have been used to purchase CBT. This was turned down. In mid 1999, Dave Rischmiller was looking for a means of training the Network Systems Management Service staff and was the driving force behind OUCS purchasing a single user licence for a number of Novell Netware and Microsoft NT titles from SmartForce. The licence was for a single user, however, the CBT was delivered on four CDs and SmartForce agreed that it would be acceptable to have one user per CD at any one time. A pilot project was designed up to try to get the best value for money from this training and to evaluate its usefulness |
![]() |
ASTD Dallas May 2000 http://www.astd.org/index_IE.html |
![]() |
Acting
like they are doing it![]() |
![]() |
We envisage
the "global learning infrastructure" -a student-centric virtual
global web of educational services- as the foundation for achieving society's
learning goals. A student-centric global learning infrastructure extends far beyond the individual virtual university to include the new digital marketplace. With its emphasis on creativity and competition, it enables a wide range of players -universities, media, publishers, content specialists, technology companies- to market, sell, and deliver educational services online <Carol Twigg, VP of Educom, The global learning infrastructure: The future of higher education Blueprint to the Digital Economy, 1998 |
| We have
to teach masses and even more so we have to turn our education or teaching
system into a learning environment, one that prepares people of every age
to survive in the new economy, new environment
The existing methods and educational systems are not sufficient and are neglecting many aspects of todays economy. We need to find a better way. A way that is adapted to a new world that gives a chance to new education Prasena considers
CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION as key drivers of the today's education systems.
We do a lot in the educational sector; and lecture at various Bangkok
Universities Bangkok U, AIT, ABAC and at business seminars such as for
Asian business forum, global learning days, ministries in Singapore as
well as our own idea of a virtual university http://www.prasena.com/public/virtual_u.html.http://www.prasena.com/public/innovation.html |
|
![]() |
Business
sample success advertising from voicecafe at www.voicecafe.com. This
is only used as a sample for a possible success in using a eLearning product
available on the market. Prasena has neither tested the correctness of the
scenario described nor had it evaluated the software itself.
Evaluation of the
product |
![]() |
Tony Waltham
Bangkok Post Database 6th March 2002 Technology has been enabling huge changes,
both around the world and here in Thailand, and as Post Database works each
week to compile the latest news, so we often ask ourselves: "What will
our readers make of this new development?'' We are always looking to see
how well Thailand is faring, both nationally and internationally, when it
comes to adopting technology, asking ourselves where does Thailand stand
in terms of its readiness to take advantage of key trends such as globalization
or internetworking. Two weeks ago, we concluded a three-week experiment
in an attempt to better understand how people here are coping with change.
This was our "Cyber-readiness on-line survey,'' which was designed
to stimulate thinking and to generate discussions around the various aspects
of change that have largely been enabled by rapid technology advances. We
were also looking to compare responses from different genders, ages and
cultures. To help craft the questionnaire and to analyze and interpret the
responses, we looked to Prasena, a research, audit and consulting company
established in Bangkok late last year. We asked Prasena to help us because
the company was built on the premise that we are now in the midst of revolutionary
change, which it calls the "Cybernetic Revolution.'' In the view of its co-founders Isabelle Michelet (who provided us with interpretations of the data), Lukas Ritzel (who was mainly responsible for the survey's provocative questions), and its business director, Philippe Kopcsan, every organization must reassess itself in the light of the impact that this revolution is having on the way we live and work. Prasena believes that the Cybernetic Revolution is characterized by nine main phenomena that affect everyone. Prasena's research director Ms Michelet explained that the first five questions in the survey sought to find out ``how the cybernetic phenomena affected the way people strategies, the way we manage our financial, technical and human resources, the way we proceed with our activities, and also to see how they affect us as a whole.'' The questions that followed reflected each of the nine cyber-phenomena, with a key characteristic being chosen for each of them. These nine aspects are the need to become global citizens, the need to become autonomous, the need to transcend established structures, the need to digitalize, the need to work virtually, the need to be part of the internetworked global community, the need to perform on a real-time basis, the need to innovate, and the need to learn continuously. <http://www.prasena.com/public/partners/media/media8_survey3.html |
![]() |
For
each of these concepts, the discriminating feature must be the primary characteristic
of the learning activity. Intensive use of the feature is required, since
incidental or occasional use of a characteristic feature is not sufficient
to qualify for a certain type of learning. For instance, running a application
from a file-server does not qualify as e-learning; and e-mailing a teacher
after taking a class on a campus is not sufficient to qualify as distance
learning. Reasoning and Discussion A definition for e-learning emerges from the parallel concept of e-mail. E-mail is typically described as the activity of transmitting "mail" with computers and networks. In the same way, e-learning refers to learning activities that involve computers and networks. (The internet and intranets are considered networks.) E-learning does not require learning materials to be delivered by computer, but computer and networks must be involved in this type of learning. Web-based learning entails content in a Web browser (not just activities), and actual learning materials delivered in Web format. In this, Web-based learning is analogous to textbooks, where the content determines whether a book is a novel, a report, or a textbook. Simply offering computer-based training for download from a Web site is not Web-based learning since there is no learning content in Web format). Web browsing the learning content (even linearly) is the key feature of Web-based learning. Web-based learning content is typically retrieved from a Web site, but alternative solutions are acceptable (a hypertext Web does not require Internet or networks). For instance, some Web-based learning offerings operate from CD-ROM, and many are offered on dual format: Web site and CD-ROM. The CD-ROM solution is typically associated with situations where network access may not be available or practical, like in schools lacking Internet access or very heavy multimedia data, such as video, animations and sound. Online learning is related to the more common concepts of online help, online documentation, and online services. It is associated with readily available learning materials in a computer environment. Often, online learning refers to learning materials directly accessible from within a core application (like in online help); however, learning materials available online on a network also qualify when readily accessible. Network use is not necessarily required, and in fact the concept of online learning surfaced before the development of the Web and before learning materials were delivered over the Internet or networks. Distance learning is a concept older than most of those discussed here. It does not require the use of computers or networks. It involves interaction between class members primarily at a distance, and enables the instructor to interact with learners. Distance learning is typically associated with televised broadcasts and correspondence courses, but it also applies to certain e-learning applications. On the Internet, educational interaction primarily at a distance is required between instructor and students, or between students. Typical distance learning in this context includes Internet-based live instructor broadcasts, video-conferencing, chat and scheduled online conference discussions, and even e-mail courses or discussions. |
![]() |
You may
be familiar with terms such as distance learning , computer based training
, online learning , or countless others . Many of these terms have
overlapping meanings, and some experts may even disagree on the best term
to use for a type of technology assisted learning. Throughout the
"e-Learning?" section of eLearners.com we will primarily use the
term e-learning . We define e-learning as any form of learning that utilizes a network for delivery, interaction, or facilitation (in a few years you might not even use the computer). The network could be the Internet, a school or college LAN or even a corporate WAN . The learning could take place individually (guided or instructed by a computer) or as part of a class. Online classes meet either synchronously (at the same time) or asynchronously (at different times), or some combination of the two. eLearners.com deals with all types of learning that fall within this broad definition of e-learning. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
eLearning
is revolutionary. As Nicholas Negroponte says, incrementalism is innovation's
worst enemy. The Internet changes everything; education and training are
about to be changed. Radically. It's time for a fresh approach. eLearning focuses on the individual learner. For years, training has organized itself for the convenience and needs of instructors, institutions, and bureaucracies. Bad attitude. Think of learners as customers. Compete for their time and interests. Provide them legendary service. Convert them into raving fans. Give them choices. Don't make them reinvent the wheel. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Sample
Asia http://www.vu.edu.pk/ Thousands of Pakistanis are being offered the chance to learn the skills they need to thrive in the computer age thanks to a new virtual university. The US$40m project is providing distance learning over the television and internet so that anyone can take part in the classes, regardless of where they live in Pakistan. The aim is to create a generation of software programmers and computer engineers who can rival the best in countries like the US. Pakistan is eager to develop an information technology industry, much like India has done. Experts estimate the country needs at least 60,000 computer science graduates to achieve this aim. "India is a very inspiring case. They got their act together very early," said Salman Ansari, adviser to Pakistan's Ministry of Science and Technology. "We are leveraging technology to get to the level that we need to get to," he told the BBC programme Go Digital. Exciting education The Virtual University combines television, video-conferencing and the internet to provide lessons, tutorials and guidance to students all over Pakistan. |
![]() |
Audio,
one-way or two, phone or VOIP Shared whiteboard Synchronized web browsing Text chat Application viewing/sharing Content windows Video, one-way or two, live or canned Discussion boards. not real-time but useful for class info or Faq's Record and playback. by instructor or student. Polling Hand-raising and yes/no buttons Pre-session content distribution Assessment/testing/scheduling |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Synchronous
learning happens in real time, so students participate simultaneously. The
experience may include simple, real-time, text-based chat and shared whiteboards.
It may also include graphic chat environments or multi-point video-conferencing.
This form of distance learning provides more interactivity. Examples of
synchronous e-learning include satellite broadcast, video teleconferencing,
Internet conferencing, and chat rooms. Asynchronous learning allows students to go to class when their schedule permits. Asynchronous learning includes everything from web-based presentations and discussions to streaming audio and video on demand, for example. Students are usually required to spend a certain amount of time per week in their virtual classroom, but it's up to them to decide when school begins and ends each day. Some examples of asynchronous training include self-paced computer-based training (CBT), Web-based training (WBT), bulletin boards, and email. Less technical forms include audio/video cassettes, and mail order programs Usenet, or internet news, is a completely threaded discussion. One can select the desired topic (newsgroup) to browse, and is then confronted with a list of all messages that have been posted to that discussion. Usenet requires special software, a news reader, to access. With a threaded system, each message is stored on its own page. Thus, to read about something more in detail, one needs to click on the link from the top page, bringing up the concerned screen. |
![]() |
Multimedia
for eLearning Video, animations, and simulations offer exceptional potential for enhancing the interface of education. Experimental demonstrations and real-life experiences and situations can be captured on video and provided as digital video. Video can be a window to the real world for a given theoretical description. In the past, there were considerable bandwidth, cost, and quality issues associated with video enhancements. However, with the development of video compression and real-time video streaming technology, many of these barriers have been overcome, and the potential for significantly increased bandwidth is real. Animations are an inexpensive alternative to the video demonstration. The animations of physical phenomena or a difficult concept can bring the point home much more effectively than video clips can. However, animations are not substitutes for video demonstrations. Simulations can provide a risk-free environment for understanding the consequences of parametric variations and can be considered hands-on experience in place of real situations. For example, flight simulators are used to train fighter pilots, and dangerous or expensive laboratory experiments can be conducted without risk, and at a lower cost. The environments created by numerical and animated simulation provide a unique opportunity to learn while increasing the retention of the concepts. |
![]() |
Clearly,
each of these types of communications has its benefits. Although in-person
communication provides opportunities to clarify and restate (and to take
advantage of tone of voice and body language), many students are reluctant
to engage in direct communication with an instructor or their fellow classmates.
Online communications via e-mail, mailing lists, and discussion boards or
chat rooms can level the playing field and remove some of the psychological
and social barriers to student-teacher and student-student interactions. Content delivery is another area in which big differences surface. Indeed, it is one of the biggest bones of contention in the war of the worlds. Traditional content delivery via written, oral, or visual lectures doesnt map well online. The term shovelware has been coined to describe the tendency to load up the Web with notes. Sir John Daniel, during his tenure at the United Kingdoms Open University, observed: ...our own Open University experience of the use of the Net and the Web at scale indicates that its most powerful and popular use is for communication between people about the course rather than for dumping the content of the course on each students computer. Asynchronous communications, on the other hand, score big in the online world. The ability to post messages, read and respond to messages, reflect on responses, revise interpretations, and modify original assumptions and perceptions is the silver bullet and a distinguishing characteristic of online teaching. Considered a hallmark of the online world, active learning actually serves as a great example of a best teaching practice that spans both worlds. Increasingly, instructors employ active and even collaborative learning in the classroom. Active learning translates well to the online world through the development of Web quests, treasure hunts, Web-based presentations, and other means for engaging students actively in the construction of knowledge. Increasingly, perhaps as a result of feedback from online courses, on-campus instructors are incorporating more active learning in their classes in conjunction with traditional lecture formats. Finally, one of the best qualities of online teaching is that it offers greater flexibility in terms of what is taught and how it is taught throughout the course. Formative assessments [MEANS BUILDING UP THE EXPERIENCE WORKING WITH A STUDENT AND ASSESS HIM/HER OVER TIME] provide opportunities for immediate feedback on student learning and learning styles, and they allow an instructor to modify the approach to achieving learning outcomes. Summative assessments [I HAVE NEVER SEEN THE STUDENT BEFORE IN MY LIFE AND JUST TEST HIM/HER ON HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE] including midterms, final exams, and end-of-course surveysin on-campus courses are not typically intended to help make in-session modifications to a course. But by taking advantage of the capability for collecting and crunching numbers quickly for statistical or qualitative analysis, online exams and surveys enable an instructor to evaluate whats working and whats not working nearly in real time. |
![]() |
About Kinko's,
Inc. Kinko's is the world's leading provider of visual communications services, document creation and copying. Its global network of over 1,000 digitally connected locations offers 24-hour access to technology for color printing, finishing and presentation services, Internet access, videoconferencing and Web-based on-demand printing and document management solutions. Named for the second consecutive year as one of Fortune's 100 best companies to work for in America, it is a privately held corporation, with more than 25,000 co-workers, and locations in nine countries. Kinko's is headquartered in Ventura, CA. For more information, go to www.kinkos.com. |
![]() |
Dynamic
whiteboard with annotation Public and private text chat between all participants Voice over IP (IP audio) Application viewing, snapshot and sharing Testing, with automated grading Pass floor control and/or multiple cursors "On the fly" collaborative browsing Remote control (desktop level) Capture for reuse Its about serving
learners and not about using technology. First of all, designing educational
experiences around technology is a foolish chase. You cannot possibly
keep up with the technology. The paradox of technology enhanced education
is that technology changes very rapidly and human beings change very slowly.
It would seem to make sense for proponents of e-learning to begin with
the students. At least that is a relatively slow moving target. Deployment
of technology then becomes an exercise in applying a rapidly improving
technology to a very consistent set of goals. Although this can be a challenge,
it is a much more doable task. Over the last 15 years, the state of the
art in distance learning has gone from satellite delivery of video, through
interactive compressed video or video conferencing to web based on-line
learning. The Sloan Foundation* did much to popularize the standard model
of on-line learning as Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALN). This model
was further enshrined when the U.S. Department of Education created the
Learning Anytime Anyplace Partnerships program (LAAP) around the Sloan
Model. The anytime-anyplace mantra became accepted dogma in the on-line
world. Proponents of the ALN models often looked down their noses at their
colleagues still operating in the older video based worlds. |
![]() |
Since the first implementations
of eLearning, defined broadly as learning using networked computers, we
have learned a great deal about the approaches that are most effective.
|
![]() |
But,
How Do We Know if Any Learning Experience is Effective?The question of
effectiveness has plagued the learning community for decades, if not centuries.
Just what is an effective learning experience? How do we determine what is a result of an essential learning skill as opposed to the contribution of the learning experience? Feuerstein (1980) asserts that a highly stimulating learning experience is not sufficient to guarantee that the person actually learns from it. Particular learning skills are also required (Howe, 1987): utilizing information in memory, remembering the past and imagining the future, understanding and looking for relationships between perceived objects, organizing and seeing patterns, regularities and other relationships. Hence, a person with very high learning skills might "learn" more readily than one without, even if the experience is highly ineffective. |
![]() |
Libraries
should be key players in university eLearning initiatives. As stated by
the Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL) in their response
to the Canadian Advisory Committee for Online Learning in May, 2001: "If
there is no provision of library information resources there can be very
little learning, online or otherwise. Libraries serve as information
literacy trainers, experts in organizing and providing access to online
resources, content providers through digitization projects, and providers
of print resources for learners.2 In the case of libraries, what is
good for the online student is also good for the campus-based student. As
one example, in a survey of universities and colleges in Canada, institutions
offering online courses are more likely to provide their students with access
to local and remote electronic library resources.3 Despite their important contribution, many libraries are often not represented on the planning committees that are making recommendations to university administrators on eLearning needs and strategies. This is a missed opportunity, both for the libraries and for the institutions. |
![]() |
Sounds all so very good! |
![]() |
What is with the people, are we ready is the mindset here. Are we ready to be virtual citizens, students, teachers. Are we ready to be available, are we ready to share knowledge, to be upgraded. |
![]() |
WHY ARE
WE SO SCARED, ARE WE SCARED TO BE REPLACE, REPLACED THROUGH VIRTUAL TEACHERS,
AVATARS
DIGITAL LIGHT ON T-SHIRT ON PASSI AVATAR ANIMATION SWITCH
|
![]() |
Same
old story can not succeed the mistake is often made of recreating a classroom-teaching model within an online learning environment. Online technology designed to mimic the classroom becomes a restriction and a barrier to the teachers ability to impart knowledge. In hypermedia-based systems, multimedia objects in the form of audio clips for graphical objects, annotated video segments, and online simulations are presented with an associated database of concepts. The modes of learning change from textual to audio, and audio to video, and so forth, as the learner invokes the multimedia objects merely by clicking on links. This provides the flexibility to acquire knowledge from different modes, e.g., auditory, visual, and kinesthetic. Web browsers are networked hypermedia interfaces that allow such flexible, multimodal explorations for a given subject matter These cognitive pathways refer to the sensory perceptions of the human mind and include vision, hearing, touch, smell, and taste. The sensory organs provide the necessary stimulus for infants to assimilate information and the human brain to assimilate knowledge. With the development of language skills, higher order learning becomes possible. The cognitive pathways then become text, graphics, audio, video, animation, and simulations. As K Chakrawan writes in his research paper School administrators must be able to perceive their school district as a whole consisting of interlocking parts, which themselves are composed of more interlocking parts [K Chakrawan Nakarat, The comparison of the impact of computers in education between Australia and Thailand, 2002] |
![]() |
Of course, while it is correct to define "us" as economic entities, we also have to look at the individual humans that make these economic entities. This is especially important when talking about Human Resources management of organizations of more than one person. Indeed, there was a time when employees were referred to as "workforce", that is a group of undifferentiated people whose status as individuals was at best ignored. Minority groups got progressive recognition over the last 100 years and granted specific rights (women, handicapped, expatriates...) but overall, the management of an organization would pretty much consider that all of its employees had similar goals in life and motivations to work. And maybe they had, even though a "workforce" often spanned over as much as four generations of employees. But the term "generation gap", often lightly used in families when they have problems with their teenage members, is now acquiring its full meaning in the corporate environment. The acceleration of change in the 20th Century and particularly with the start of the Cybernetic Revolution has already had a dramatic impact on Humans. From one generation to the next, people have a different perception of the world and their place within it. They think differently, their reference values and role models are different. This means that they don't work the same way, and neither do they work for the same reasons. It is very important that these differences be identified, analyzed and taken into consideration in any management process and decision. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Generation
X (born 1960-1975) A category of people who wanted to hop off the merry-go-round of status, money, and social climbing that so often frames modern existence. Such people are described as underemployed, overeducated, intensely private and unpredictable. People born among analog technologies (telephone, TV). Witnessed and participated in development of digital technologies. Although it is the "Silent" (1930-1945) and "Baby-Boom" (1945-1960) generations who invented the technologies that enabled the Cybernetic Revolution, it is difficult to include them in the "Cybernetic Revolution generations". Indeed, it is as if they had unleashed a monster that they fear is uncontrollable, and they often have the greatest difficulties to enjoy the effects of their creation. The first transition generation is therefore the famous "Gen X". It is famous especially among HR Managers, because it is the first generation of employees that started to really question authority. "Xers" appear unmanageable because the traditional carrots and sticks do not work with these "hard-heads", whose personal goals and professional aspirations are so different from their elders'. While teenagers, Xers witnessed the emergence of the digital technologies that demonstrated the uselessness of most of what they were learning at school, as well as the irrelevance of their elders' advice and guidance. They started to collect with relish the famous "last words" or blunders such as the quote from IBM founder Thomas Watson predicting that there was a market for about five computers in the world. At this early stage of the digital technologies, new solutions were sprouting and dying so fast that no reference seemed reliable. Hence the X-ers' tendency to do everything their own way, and take nothing at face value. X-ers constitute today the core of the so-called "workforce". They still often have difficulties with elder management, but they begin to have power enough to change rules and policies towards their own beliefs and values. In doing so, they need to be careful, because the new generations are as different from them as they were from Silent and Baby Boom generations. Characterized by individualism, resourcefulness, cynicism, selfishness, result-orientation, taste for experimentation, tendency to question authority, relatively high education, deep-seated economic insecurity, lack of social trust and confidence in government, weak allegiance to country and political parties, tendency to marry and have children late. Go-getters who are just doing it but their way (Time Magazine) |
![]() |
Ask yourself: Would you rather learn in your own speed, at what ever time and for how long as you wish. Would you like to interact with the world and actively participate at your own education. Would you be ready to find your own way through the education system and even perhaps get lost from time to time. Would you prefer to research and filter information for yourself and decided yourself which one is relevant and which one less. Would you be ready to see the teacher more as a guide or quiz master than the all-dominating and all-knowing authority who takes over for you. Would you be ready to take responsibility for your own success within your very own education. Would you like to becocme a virtual student and have a virtual pint [beer], easy, just visit http://www.drinktalking.com/student_union_bars The Perils of the
Virtual Student in Cyberspace by Julie Hook |
![]() |
Generation
Y (born 1975-1990) People born among first generation of digital technologies. Witnessed and participated in development of networked technologies Successors of Generation X, children of Baby-Boomers. Grew up in economic expansion, end of cold war, blooming freedoms Characterized by high self-esteem and confidence, multi-tasking ability, capacity to process information very fast, urge to develop a career fast, tendency to expect to be given high responsibilities immediately, arrogance, upbeat character, individualism, impatience, boldness, tendency to overestimate themselves, tendency to expect employer to adapt to them, optimism The Generation Y constitutes today the junior part of the workforce, which it has been entering for about five years. In fact, it might have started to impact the corporate world much earlier, whether it was invited to do so, or not! Y-ers are the first people in History that have spent all their lives among digital technologies. They take them for granted and show an uncanny ability to use them in ways and in a scope never imagined by their elders. And they are much less patient than the X-ers. Because the Gen X grew up in an environment where processes were first manual, then became digital but with severe limitations in memory and reliability, X-ers developed a careful process-based analytical approach to issues. For them, things need to be conceptualized first, then implemented, then tested. Y-ers have no taste or time for this. In the view of Gen Y, digital technologies are reliable and conduct most of the analytical process - Humans don't test them, they use them, play with them. Gen Y hackers are not Gen X hackers: they don't try to demonstrate that a system does not work and make fun of the failure, they just use the system as it is to go wherever they want and do whatever they want. A Gen X hacker would crack into the CIA just for the fun of showing that the CIA's security systems are not secure. A Gen Y hacker would crack into the CIA to access information he/she wants to change a file, watch the ripple effect and feel the power to change the world. Y-ers are in a hurry to seize the power and change the world. The more so, maybe, because they know that once the next generation comes in, they won't have much to say anymore... |
![]() |
Millennial
Generation, or Generation e (born >1990) People born among new technologies Successors of Generation Y, children of Generation X. Grow up in crisis environment, uncertainty in the face of change Characterized by awareness of the world, environment-consciousness, high technology-literacy, urge to grow up fast, disrespect for elders and authority, lack of proper role models and references, self-confidence It will be some time, before we see the Generation "e" join employees' ranks. Yet, we already watch them in awe, as if they were some kind of aliens. Gurus use them as references, quoting them in their serious economic books. Our six-year olds teach us how to use this or that web application, looking with perplexed eyes at those Mums and Dads who don't even know such simple things. Although many more technologies will probably be invented in the future, today's children are born at a stage when both the technologies that enabled the Cybernetic Revolution (digital technologies) and those that allow it to gain full speed (networked technologies) are fully operational. Two generations away from the pre-Cybernetic Revolution era, they will remember it no more than their parents remember the pre-typewriter age. Because of the pace of change, these children will have no role model to refer to, and they certainly won't look up to their elders, whose shortcomings they already see too well. Yet, we must remember that these children will soon inherit our organizations. For the sake of economic survival and to avoid traumatic upheavals, we must ensure that they consider these organizations and their structures usable. And this requires a lot of preparations, starting with the rethinking of our entire business model and ways of working, in the perspective of the Cybernetic Revolution and its characteristics. |
![]() |
Sounds
all so very good! Is e the solution we have been waiting for Is it simple Is it only the students that have to change Will it be the solution for all educational institutes and their tutors Will it be the definitive end of all Universities as we knew them for centuries Can it be done over night: The biggest problem is we live in a nano second world where all things are supposed to be done in an instant. That kind of attitude is deadly for projects like this. What we need are people who think in terms of decades, not years. People who would treasure Stewart Brand's "The Clock of The Long Now" --ones who would agree this project is "generationaly worthy" ---something my grandson Michael Ross, will want to pass on to his grandson. It's for sponsors who know that if we can grow awareness in the miracles of distance education we can grow the size of the pie...so vendors like WebCt can get more of their share. Is such awareness about distance education needed? You bet. How many know there are over 1.2 million courses available from hundreds of fine universities worldwide? How many know that education online is better than education face-to-face? How many employers know that workers trained by distance means are more likely to become all stars than those trained conventionally? Here's our deal with the corporate world. We bring them knowledge customers and knowledge workers. They bring us the resources to build our stage, promote the event and fund the prizes. |
![]() |
BUT EVEN
IF THE FEAR IS GONE AND THE SYSTEM IS SETUP, WHY SUCH A DISAPPOINTING UTILIZATION
RATE
Low utilization rates
- hundreds of corporations have spent millions of dollars on e-Learning
only to discover that only very few of their employees are actually using
courses online. Why? Dismal usage rates happen for several reasons, which
range from no motivation, or incentive, for learning to a lack of effective
internal marketing and communication. |
![]() |
Barriers
to entry may be low, but barriers to success are certainly quite high. A
cursory examination of the patterns of development of virtual universities
demonstrates that it is a lot harder to be successful than many thought.
It is very easy to start a virtual university. All one had to do was to
set up a server, create a portal, acquire a learning management system,
develop some courses, and begin the marketing. For those institutions finding
this too much to contemplate, learning service providers would come in and
do it all for you. Entry was easy. As we have seen, finding success has been considerably more difficult. Even defining success becomes elusive. For those institutions that took the for-profit route, either on their own or in a joint venture, success often meant large financial returns. Now that visions of e-learning billions have evaporated for most institutions, we will get down to the serious business of creating the leading virtual universities. These institutions will be both public and private. We have seen that both models can work if the institutions are clear about their goals and organize themselves appropriately. Mixing unlike goals or a lack of clarity in goals will continue to be a sign of expected failure. Nearly every university will have some involvement in on-line learning, but not every university will be a net exporter of educational programs. Reputation, or brand, will be very important, but it will not be the whole story. Strong brands with weak programs will not be successful. There will be room for different kinds of brands to serve different characteristics of learners. Some will be price sensitive and some will not. Some will want nothing but the designer brand programs and some will seek commodity style education at wholesale prices. Just as some people buy Mercedes while others buy Lexus, learners will seek out brands that appeal to their sense of themselves and their needs. Even within a market segment, there will be room for market differentiation. Some will prefer Toyota to Honda. Others will want Lexus instead of Mercedes. The e-learning revolution is not over. It is just entering a more intelligent and less self-indulgent phase. History demonstrates that the first movers in technology are rarely the eventual leaders. Dumont may have invented the television, but the company disappeared in the early days of television. Edison invented electrical generation, but his DC systems lost out to the AC systems of later competitors. There is lots of opportunity for excitement in the next few years. Moores law* is continuing the relentless increase in computing power and continuing to push down prices. The bandwidth law shows that we will continue to see faster and faster networks bringing higher and higher quality materials into our homes. There is much that is predictable over the coming decade. Technology is relentless and dependable in its advance. Human beings will continue to exhibit the characteristics that they have exhibited for centuries. Maslovs** hierarchy of human needs will change little. The paradox of a rapidly changing technology serving a slowly changing humankind will provide opportunities for those who start from culture, values, and human need and have the insight and courage to know how technology can serve these. *http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/M/Moores_Law.html **http://www.connect.net/georgen/maslow.htm |
![]() |
What is my message : Forget the e |
![]() |
eLearning is just a tool: A way to get there |
![]() |
|
![]() |
There might be e components, there sure is a new way to conduct learning |
![]() |
While we
cannot yet establish all reasons for the complaints, there are obvious contributing
consequences of a rush to "go-digital": Reasons to Fail Poor quality content regardless of format Poor instructional design Inappropriate software decisions Inappropriate content for the business and learning objectives Technology and infrastructure problems eLearning is not a prediction. (Half of all major corporate software projects fail, as do two-thirds of all knowledge initiatives -- and eLearning is an even greater challenge.) Rather, eLearning is a target to shoot for and catalyst to spark fresh ideas [Jay Cross, 2002] 2001, almost every college and university announced that they were going on-line. Venture capitalists dumped billions into eLearning start-ups of all kinds. There were billions to be made and the first movers would be the ones to profit! Or so we thought. The new for-profit start-ups dangled visions of millions of dollars in front of Presidents and Deans, and some jumped at the chance. Pensare teamed up with Duke. Click2Learn teamed with NYU Online. Fathom teamed with XanEdu. The University of Pennsylvanias Wharton School teamed with Caliber, a spin-off from Sylvan Learning. Cornell spun of eCornell to the consternation of faculty. Kaplan Ventures, Knowledge Universe, Pearson, and Sylvan Ventures made investments and acquisitions totaling $3.6 billion in 2000 and were expected to invest at least $2 billion additional in 2001 and 2002. UNext created Cardean University and partnered with Columbia, the London School of Economics, Stanford, Carnegie Mellon, and the University of Chicago. Reportedly Cardean had pledged to pay Columbia, and perhaps the others, $20 million dollars if they failed within five years. The exact structure of the contracts is not public. North Carolina, Harvard, and the University of Southern California went to University Access for help in getting online. Harcourt Higher Education was launched as a college in 2000 and confidently predicted 50,000 to 100,000 enrollments within five years. That was then and this is now. Pensare is gone. Unable to attract the external financing that it had hoped for, Fathom had to obtain $20 million in financing internally. Cardean has laid off over half its work force this year and has asked the universities to restructure the business arrangement. Rumors suggest that restructure means that the universities are not getting their $ 20 million after all! Temple University, who had followed the crowd in creating a for-profit spin-off, quietly closed that spin-off without really ever activating it. They got more press for closing a virtually non-existent operation than most others get for running viable programs! Harcourt is gone after enrolling a total of 32 students in 2001. eCornell is open now, but with very small programs and drastically reduced expectations. Caliber has filed for bankruptcy. University Access has changed its name and withdrawn from higher education. The Chronicle asks wryly Is anyone making money on on-line learning? The conclusion seems to be that there are indeed a few organizations that have demonstrated viability. The University of Maryland University Colleges effort UMUC-Online, Penn States World Campus and the University of Massachusetts UMass Online represent campus based programs that have had some success. The University of Phoenix is everyones poster child for the for-profit online university, either as a cautionary tale of a market mentality applied to higher education or as an investment success that demonstrates the viability of such an approach. The very mixed picture is probably a manifestation of the confusion that reigns about the purpose and the place for on-line higher education. |
![]() |
Does it not look familiar, the very same reasons that have been |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Why . |
![]() |
Dr. Phillip
Harter of Stanford University : If we could shrink the earths population to a village of only 100 people, it would look something like this: 1 would have a computer But many more would have access to TV and radio There is much to be gained from sharing innovative uses of technology as well as in helping entrepreneurs in the field who build sustainable businesses. UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said earlier this year that "... we are still very far from ensuring that the benefits of ICT are available to all. The digital divide still yawns as widely as ever, with billions of people still unconnected to a global society, which, on its side, is more and more wired." |
![]() |
Multi-linguist Capable of obtaining relevant information directly from its source Power-user of ICT Capable of getting fast the information they need through individual/organizational/global infostructure Capable of spreading their ideas fast for real-time recognition and application Demonstrates key competencies: Adaptable, flexible, creative, problem-solver, decision-maker, eager to learn continuously |
![]() |
http://www.prasena.com/public/gld6/techspec.htm http://www.prasena.com/public/gld6/eColonizationAsia.htm http://www.alado.net http://www.bfranklin.edu/gld7/celebration.htm |
![]() |
Many eLearning
researchers and practitioners feel the evidence is substantial enough to
declare that online learning works and the field must move on to more important
questions ELearning has shown to result in effective learning experience for students although there is a need to find methods to reduce the learning curve and workload of faculty. We also need to better understand the value-added that higher bandwidth networks and new software and hardware technologies will provide to learning. While access to new student markets has not been widely demonstrated, it is still early in eLearnings development and program offerings are limited. Todays growth and profitability expectations, as in many industries, are more inline with reality. The hope is that the pioneering efforts of university faculty and staff will garner the attention of their colleagues and university administrators who will recognize, support, and spread these innovations across faculties. The battle for students - the ugly word is customers - is just beginning. Institutions of learning which do not have merchandising skills are as handicapped as a golfer without a sand wedge. Staying on the leader board of education, and keeping the corporate snouts out of our tent, means learning to use some of their tools. [john hibbs, 2002] |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Some exciting
links to eLearning sites and samples: Office learning Safari - http://www.icus.net/pages/home/LCA/index.htm Blended learning models - http://www.learningcircuits.com/2002/aug2002/valiathan.html Six of the best ways to make e-learning work - http://www.personneltoday.com/pt_news/news_feat_det.asp?liArticleid=13982 The virtual student - http://www.virtualstudent.com/ European observatory on elearning - http://www.education-observatories.net/index.pt Marvin Minsky a AI guru - http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/ Global Internet learn day - http://www.bfranklin.edu/gld6catalog/ Tech eLearning - http://www.techlearning.com/index.html Creating the future with Toffler - http://www.toffler.com/default.shtml Internet time group with Jay Cross eLearning internet zine - http://www.elearningmag.com/elearning/ eLearning internet forum - http://www.elearningforum.com/ eLearningPost - http://www.elearningpost.com/features/archives/001200.asp Challenge of learning in a brave new world - http://www.hcc.ac.th/colt1/ Listing of eUniversities - http://www.le.ac.uk/cc/rjm1/isp/ele.html The eLearningGuild - http://www.elearningguild.com/ eLearning center - http://www.e-learningcentre.co.uk/eclipse/default.htm eLearning glossary - http://www.learningcircuits.org/glossary.html Free eLearning samples, register at http://www.e-learningcentre.co.uk/eclipse/help/e-Workshops.htm |